De kracht van selectieve onwetendheid

man in een museum kijkt op zijn telefoon - foto niek de greef

Er is een interessante logica te vinden in de Buddhist Noble Truths. Ik parafraseer:

Suffering is caused by desire, attachment, and general craving. Eliminating craving reduces our suffering.

Verlangen neemt af door de oorzaak ervan weg te nemen. Onwetendheid is de hoofdoorzaak. Onwetendheid is een diepgewortelde cognitieve en perceptuele blindheid die ervoor zorgt dat wezens de werkelijkheid verkeerd interpreteren.

Onwetendheid is een interessant woord als je deze context in ogenschouw neemt. Er is onwetendheid in de zin van niet weten, wat de negatieve connotatie heeft van dom zijn, en onwetendheid in de zin van negeren of geen aandacht schenken.

We kunnen dingen negeren die we willen bezitten, interesses negeren die we hebben, zodat we ons kunnen concentreren op de essentiële dingen, en dingen negeren die we denken te moeten weten – waardoor we de meest letterlijke vorm van onwetendheid bereiken. Deze daad van selectieve onwetendheid kan bevrijdend werken en ons bevrijden van de last van onnodige informatie.

Dit concept van onwetendheid kan ook positief worden geherformuleerd als ‘selectieve onwetendheid’: kiezen waar je je op concentreert en wat je negeert om mentale rommel en lijden te verminderen.

Focus en onwetendheid

In onze ambities vergelijken we onszelf met anderen. We observeren en benijden hun prestaties en oordelen. Geen van beide is nuttig.

Robert Greene schrijft in Mastery over hoe de meesters in hun vakgebied – de mensen over wie hij in zijn boek schrijft – zich concentreerden op hun sterke punten. Deze focus op persoonlijke sterke punten geeft hen kracht en het vertrouwen om hun doelen na te streven.

…ignore your weaknesses and resist the temptation to be more like others. Instead… direct yourself toward the small things you are good at.

man jogging on deserted island - foto niek de greef

In Advice for Living deelt Kevin Kelly zijn wijsheid over zorgen over de mening van anderen:

Ignore what others may be thinking of you because they aren’t thinking of you.

Aandacht, media en onwetendheid

In de wereld van vandaag zijn we verslaafd aan nieuws. Als we naar het nieuws kijken, voelen we ons machteloos tegenover de daden van een klein aantal slechte mensen. We verlangen naar beter nieuws, meer updates. Nieuwsagentschappen reageren net als sigarettenfabrikanten: ze stemmen hun producten af op onze verslavende behoeften met een negatieve inslag, sensationele koppen en continu breaking news.

Oliver Burkeman overtuigt ons in Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals dat de media onze aandacht stelen:

The unsettling possibility is that if you’re convinced that none of this is a problem for you-that social media hasn’t turned you into an angrier, less empathetic, more anxious, or more numbed-out version of yourself-that might be because it has. Your finite time has been appropriated without your realizing anything’s amiss.

We zijn verslaafd. Maar we kunnen onszelf helpen door onwetendheid na te streven. We kunnen meldingen negeren en uitschakelen, en minder vaak nieuwsbronnen raadplegen.

Misschien zijn we beter af met een nieuwsbron die niet gedijt op actualiteit, maar op een langetermijnperspectief. Dat zal niet gratis zijn, want het is niet onze aandacht die voor deze diensten betaalt, maar de waarde die ze bieden voor ons geluk, waarvoor we in ruil daarvoor geld betalen. Deze verschuiving in perspectief kan geruststellend zijn, wetende dat we onze aandacht investeren in iets dat er echt toe doet.

All the Lovers in the Night: On Isolation and Connection

All the Lovers in the Night
Mieko Kawakami

A strange mix of loneliness, connection, and love come together in All the Lovers in the Night by Mieko Kawakami.

Fuyuko is a reclusive proofreader at a publishing house. She has virtually no social life.

One day, Fuyuko comes into contact with Hijiri, who persuades her to go freelance. Fuyuko more or less befriends Hijiri and is somewhat taken out of her isolation by this friendship. Fuyuko learns to drink alcohol, but without any measure.

She meets Mr. Mitsutsuka, an older man, when she attempts to enroll them in a course. She starts meeting him more frequently after an initial reluctance. They have special and increasingly intimate conversations. A strange, affectionate relationship develops.

Not saying a word, just standing there, Mitsutsuka looked like he was waiting patiently for my tears to settle. I heard a car go by, not very far away from us. Using my palm, I wiped the tears dripping down my chin, then rubbed my eyes, covered my face, and started crying again. Mitsutsuka lifted his free hand and rested it on the crown of my head. I thought I could feel the heat of his hand entering my skin. With his palm still on my head, I asked Mitsutsuka if he would spend my birthday with me, in a voice that was almost all sob. Will you walk through the night with me? And will you listen to that song with me, just the two of us?

The character Fuyuko bears resemblance to the strangely named Natsuke in Earthlings by Sayaka Murata. Women who cannot ground themselves in this world, or at least in Japanese society, and live socially isolated lives. Where in Earthlings an unbearable burden develops in the protagonist Natsuke, Kawakami’s story is more loving, and Fuyuko manages to maintain a certain lightness and optimism.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb on the artisanal and techno-dissatisfaction

Douglas Coupland predicted that the crafted object might become the emerging “technology” of modern art. Analog experiences are where art is enjoyed.

In Antifragile, Nassim Nicholas Taleb explores technology and art from the perspective of fragility. Technology is designed to replace older, inferior technology.

Technology is at its best when it is invisible. I am convinced that technology is of greatest benefit when it displaces the deleterious, unnatural, alienating, and, most of all, inherently fragile preceding technology.

So it may be a natural property of technology to only want to be displaced by itself.

But not all technology disappears. The Lindy effect applies to technology.

For the nonperishable, every additional day may imply a longer life expectancy. So the longer a technology lives, the longer it can be expected to live.

But in general, the older the technology, not only the longer it is expected to last, but the more certainty I can attach to such a statement.

People experience new technology like a treadmill effect.

People acquire a new item, feel more satisfied after an initial boost, then rapidly revert to their baseline of well-being. So, when you “upgrade,” you feel a boost of satisfaction with changes in technology. But then you get used to it and start hunting for the new new thing.

Taleb states that this effect does not apply to classical art, as well as to analog and physical experiences. These experiences appear to be exempt from men’s hedonic decline in satisfaction.

But it looks as though we don’t incur the same treadmilling techno-dissatisfaction with classical art, older furniture—whatever we do not put in the category of the technological.

I have never heard anyone address the large differences between e-readers and physical books, like smell, texture, dimension (books are in three dimensions), color, ability to change pages, physicality of an object compared to a computer screen, and hidden properties causing unexplained differences in enjoyment.

The big differentiator, according to Taleb, is the infusion of the maker’s love in the created art object.

But consider the difference between the artisanal—the other category—and the industrial. What is artisanal has the love of the maker infused in it, and tends to satisfy—we don’t have this nagging impression of incompleteness we encounter with electronics. It also so happens that whatever is technological happens to be fragile. Articles made by an artisan cause fewer treadmill effects. And they tend to have some antifragility—recall how my artisanal shoes take months before becoming comfortable.

The medicine against our technology addiction is not the upgrade to the latest. The medicine is the downgrade to the analog, real-life experience, and the physical object.

Neil Postman on Huxley and Orwell: the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy

In Amusing Ourselves to Death, Neil Postman discusses the consequences of a culture transitioning from orality to literacy to visual media.

The number of hours the average American watches TV has remained steady, at about four and a half hours a day, every day (by age sixty-five, a person will have spent twelve uninterrupted years in front of the TV).

The Internet and smart phones have shifted the focus from TV to the Internet, but not the total amount of time spent on these media.

Postman looks at the great literary dystopians Orwell and Huxley, who must have foreseen such developments and the dangers they bring along.

Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley’s vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.

Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.”

The Blob: No-Face as a Mirror to Billionaire’s Greed

A blob has no sense of self. All it knows is that it must become bigger. Our world is full of self-centered blobs.

The blob is in pain. The movie Spirited Away features a character similar to a blob: No-Face. No-Face wants attention, so he swallows the bathhouse employees. In the process, he adopts all the negative traits of those he consumes. No-Face becomes an arrogant, disgruntled, and selfish monster.

The amorphous blobs of this world — large organizations and individuals — want our attention. And there is never enough of it. Driven by attention mania and the temporary satisfaction that these blob gets from power and prestige, the blob keeps eating. It clings to everything around it in a meaningless and frenetic way.

The blob doesn’t like being told not to eat just anything. This gets the blob angry and mean because the blob needs to grow. Then, the blob deploys his soldiers. An army of dependents, frightened to the bone followers, is deployed to ensure that the blob can continue to grow. All work for the benefit of the blob.

In Spirited Away, No-Face offers gold to make the creatures around him like him. The creatures accept the gold and obey the blob. But when Chihiro refuses the gold yet is kind to him anyway, No-Face becomes so upset and confused, and sick of himself, that he vomits up everything he has swallowed. Only then does he find a balance in his existence—an existence in which he does not always want to devour others. No-Face turns into a humble being.

Let’s feel sorry for the No-Faces of this world. The pitiable CEOs are morbidly seeking attention. These No-Faces use their money, business, wives, and children—everything to get attention.

But no one likes them. No-Face is a nasty, selfish creature that lives a terrible life of eternal dissatisfaction. They can’t be helped. They can only help themselves and puke out everything they have swallowed.

On Luscinia svecica and two Homo copiarius subspecies

This week, we walked across the Engbertsdijkvenen. We spotted an uncommon bird, the Bluethroat (Luscinia svecica). Helped by the app Merlin Bird ID, an app that lets you listen to birds like you’ve never heard them.

We also spotted Homo copiarius avium, a species of Homo sapiens equipped with a still camera with an 800mm lens. I can estimate this species quite well since I am of the affiliated subspecies Homo copiarius platea, also outfitted with a camera, but with a 28 or 35mm lens. Whereas the Homo copiarius platea like me is more often found in inhabited areas, where it generally operates in isolation, the Homo copiarius avium is found in nature reserves, where they operate in groups of 3 to 7 of their conspecifics, and often congregate in observation huts to share their collections of copied birds.

Ben van den Broek made this picture of the Bluethroat.

Beeld van een wandeling bij Vriezenveen

Ik maakte een korte video van de wandeling van gisteren over de venen bij Vriezenveen.

Beyond Time Management: Oliver Burkeman’s ‘Four Thousand Weeks’

Four Thousand Week – Time Management for Mortals, by Oliver Burkeman, is a book about what Burkeman calls “the paradox of limitation.”

All of this illustrates what might be termed the paradox of limitation, which runs through everything that follows: the more you try to manage your time with the goal of achieving a feeling of total control, and freedom from the inevitable constraints of being human, the more stressful, empty, and frustrating life gets. But the more you confront the facts of finitude instead—and work with them, rather than against them—the more productive, meaningful, and joyful life becomes.

Burkeman shares a wealth of wisdom on how we can achieve more focus in our lives without getting overwhelmed by our social media addiction and how the media manipulates us for the sake of gaining more eyeballs on the media itself (the media is the message, as Marshall McLuhan concluded years ago).

The unsettling possibility is that if you’re convinced that none of this is a problem for you—that social media hasn’t turned you into an angrier, less empathetic, more anxious, or more numbed-out version of yourself—that might be because it has. Your finite time has been appropriated, without your realizing anything’s amiss.

It’s been obvious for some time now, of course, that all this constitutes a political emergency. By portraying our opponents as beyond persuasion, social media sorts us into ever more hostile tribes, then rewards us, with likes and shares, for the most hyperbolic denunciations of the other side, fueling a vicious cycle that makes sane debate impossible.

The book is a gem. I conclude with his advice for a more creative life.

In practical terms, three rules of thumb are especially useful for harnessing the power of patience as a creative force in daily life. The first is to develop a taste for having problems.

Once you give up on the unattainable goal of eradicating all your problems, it becomes possible to develop an appreciation for the fact that life just is a process of engaging with problem after problem…

The second principle is to embrace radical incrementalism.

When you accept that you probably won’t produce very much on any individual day, you will find that you produce much more over the long term.

One critical aspect of the radical incrementalist approach, which runs counter to much mainstream advice on productivity, is thus to be willing to stop when your daily time is up, even when you’re bursting with energy and feel as though you could get much more done.

Stopping helps strengthen the muscle of patience that will permit you to return to the project again and again…

The final principle is that, more often than not, originality lies on the far side of unoriginality.

This is the principle known as “Stay On The Bus”. You don’t find originality around the corner. It is in the depth of the work.

… it begins at all only for those who who can muster the patience to immerse themselves in the earlier stage – the trial-and-error phase of copying others, learning new skills, and accumulating experience.

Burkeman uses the metaphor of the long-married couple.

To experience the profound mutual understanding of the long-married couple, you have to stay married to one person; to know what it’s like to be deeply rooted in a particular community and place, you have to stop moving around. Those are the kinds of meaningful and singular accomplishments that just take the time they take.

Foto’s printen en prints fotograferen

Ik ben bezig met het afdrukken van deze serie zwart-witfoto’s en eindelijk gaat nu goed. De afdrukken op Canson Infinity Baryta Photographique II (bedenk eens zo’n naam voor een papiersoort) zien er erg mooi uit.

Nu wil ik de resultaten van dit werk delen, dus moet ik een goede foto van de afdruk maken. Dat is niet zo eenvoudig als het lijkt. Ondanks de glans van het papier reflecteert de afdruk licht, waardoor er donkere vlekken op de foto ontstaan. Niet zo mooi.

Of ik ben te kieskeurig.

Foto van print van foto van Oostknollendam
Oostknollendam

Looking for Alaska – not that Alaska – by John Green

I somehow thought Looking for Alaska was set somewhere in the state of Alaska. So it isn’t.

Miles is a shy, slouchy boy who seems to know what he can and what he wants. Of his own accord, he goes to a boarding school. He befriends Chip, Takumi, and the peculiar girl Alaska, who are other cost-schoolers from the poorer strata of society. They form a club to take on the arrogant kids from more affluent families.

Miles and his friends are somewhat outcasts at the school. They smoke and drink and share a love of literature. Miles falls in love with Alaska. She had a rather complicated childhood after her mother died at a young age.
At the end of school, Alaska crashes in the middle of the night in her car on her way to her mother’s grave. The question that occupies the teenagers left behind is whether she committed suicide and, more importantly, why she would have done so. The second half of the book finds Miles and his friends searching for the answers to these questions, in addition to bullying the Eagle, the dean of the school. In the second part, I miss the quirks of the Alaska character. But she is dead.

John Green says in the book’s epilogue that this story did not succeed as well as his other books have succeeded, mainly because his regular editor could not help him with this one. I think Green lacks a little self-confidence because Looking for Alaska is just a very good book. In Anthropocene Reviewed style, I give Looking for Alaska … 5 stars.