Over boeken, literaire reflecties en het web van literatuur, door Niek de Greef. Werner Herzog, Paul Theroux, V.S. Naipaul en meer. Nederlandse en Engelstalige boeken.

Science-fiction the future?

I read an article on science fiction on Ted Gioia’s blog.

I started reading science-fiction books. And lots of them.

This made no sense. The last time I had taken a serious interest in science fiction was in 8th grade. The typical mid-life crisis is an attempt to recapture the magic of your late teens and twenties. And here I was revisiting a passion that had disappeared at age twelve.

reading books - photo by niek de greef

I have a similar experience. I did read some science fiction as a child and adolescent, but it generally could only interest me moderately. I read books like 1948 by Orwell, Brave New World by Huxley, and A Clockwork Orange by Burgess, which, although science fiction lists, I consider more like (rather dystopian) novels of the future.

Being firmly in the beta profession, I had many friends who also read science fiction. Somehow, it seemed to me at the time to be something for betas, which doesn’t seem to be correct. Without having researched it, I would venture to say that when betas read books, it is more often science fiction than anything else.

I read a lot anyway, and also things that chafed at science fiction. The Lord of The Rings, by Tolkien, before it became popular, I think with that, but that’s probably not right. I also read The Day of the Triffids, by Wyndham (ok yet core science fiction). I read H.P. Lovecraft (more horror?). But I never really got “hooked” on the genre.

I also think it was because in high school the science fiction genre was dismissed with much disdain.

A few years ago, I started reading more science fiction. I never before read Isaac Asimov or Ray Bradbury (yes I read his On Writing – a great book). I’m definitely going to catch up on that. I’m also going to read more of Stephen King.

Andy Hamilton’s handgeschreven boek Longhand

BOOK: Longhand Paperback by Andy Hamilton (Outnumbered ...

Een interessant project van Andy Hamilton, Longhand, een met de hand geschreven roman. Interessant detail is dat Hamilton een aparte manier van schrijven heeft doordat hij de duim van zijn schrijfhand op jonge leeftijd is verloren. Hij houdt de pen in zijn linkerhand en stuurt de schrijfbeweging met zijn rechterhand.

PS. Ik vind geen goede Nederlandse vertaling van het woord longhand. Ik denk dat “handgeschreven” het dichtst in de buurt komt, maar vraag me af of het de lading helemaal dekt. Ik vind het ook een veel lelijker woord, handgeschreven.

Shopping In Jail by Douglas Coupland: Notes on Surrealism, Technology, and Modern Art

Shopping In Jail

My notes from reading Shopping In Jail by Douglas Coupland:

About surrealism, the subconscious, Internet.

Surrealism today: a randomizer, throwing images and video clips at you. Like taking a snip out of time and putting these in sequence.

On Ed Ruscha. And about the insignificance of (most) of our actions and of (most) art.

About Craft and novelty. Novelty that reflects the prominent yet less powerful forces of a culture is interesting. The crafted object may be the new modern art, in a world of digital overwhelm.

A piece on Hari Kunzru’s Gods Without Men. The piece is difficult to follow, I have not read that book. It seems a literary manifestation like Harari’s Homo Deus:

Raj is whatever and whoever it is we all seem to have become: a race of time-traveling time killers Googling and Wikiing until our machines transform into something smarter than ourselves, we humans left only to hope the machines may save us in the process.

A piece about Coupland’s visit to China for the book Kitten Clone. About how China is fully embracing new technology and the western world is hesitating complacently (if complacently is a word).

I find it difficult to accept that the new iPhone 12 or foldable Samsung is necessarily a significant technological development I cannot ignore. In my opinion we are too heads-down in today to be able to make sound judgements on the historical relevance of specific, or even more general technological developments.

I understand very well why it’s located in Shanghai, but not why there isn’t also one located in Michigan, where 10 million primates needing 2,500 calories a day are sitting on top of a cold rock in the middle of the North American continent, and they’ve got nothing to do all day except go online and watch porn, TED videos, and bit-torrented movies, …

A piece about Marshall McLuhan, again difficult because I have not read McLuhans work yet. I want though. His work sounds very intriguing.
McLuhan is a futurist. Coupland sees how with all that data that “the internet” knows about us, a cloud gänger is thinkable, but he misses sentience.
The same word that Kevin Kelly uses as one of the characteristics of the Technium, the “living” body of evolving technologies.
Sentience of the Technium is not yet to be born. It is there already, says Kelly.