Over boeken, literaire reflecties en het web van literatuur, door Niek de Greef. Werner Herzog, Paul Theroux, V.S. Naipaul en meer. Nederlandse en Engelstalige boeken.

Remarkable mathematical truths

Kurt Gödel

Deductive systems are either incomplete or inconsistent. Meaning

  • Inconsistent: they contain contradictions. Statements can be true and false in the same deductive system.
  • Incomplete: Statements can be found that can not be proven to be true or false.

Gödel proved this for us.

Wittgenstein formulated something similar:

The truth is built of true facts and untrue facts: facts that are not based on a system of observation yet are true anyway. Nevertheless, Wittgenstein seems to disagree with Gödel’s incompleteness theorem. Food for a lasting scientific debate. Anyway, Wittgenstein was looking at language and philosophy, not at mathematics.

Final remarkable mathematical truth for now from Cantor.

Cantor proved that one infinity is not the same as the other infinity. He developed a way to compare infinite sets and describe how infinite sets with different characteristics exist.

As an example, Cantor proved that real numbers are more numerous than the set of natural numbers. While both are infinite. He also invented a way to operate on infinite sets.

Cantor ended up in a mental hospital, which seems to be viewed as as heroic achievement among mathematicians—an opinion I do not share.

I recall reading The Mystery of the Aleph by Amir D. Aczel about Cantor. Unfortunately, I have lost my notes and the book. This book was very accessible, I do recall that.

Murakami’s Norwegian Wood reread

On the plane back from Prague, I finished reading Norwegian Wood—re-reading, actually. I don’t often re-read books, but Murakami is a favorite of mine.

Watanabe is in love with Naoko. She is the girlfriend of their mutual friend, who died at a very young age. Naoko can not cope with life and commits suicide in the end, while Watanabe is torn between emotions he is not able to identify or is not even conscious of. The girl who falls in love with him must tell him he is in love with her. An old friend tells him he has to choose for himself. While perfectly capable of analyzing other people’s situations, he is unable to analyze his own issues. Let alone that he is able to come up with a choice for his own problems he is not even aware of.

Dieren Eten van Jonathan Safran Foer

Dieren eten van Jonathan Safran Foer is een boek dat iedere vleeseter eens zou moeten lezen om zich te realiseren wat de vlees industrie voor gezondheidsrisico’s, milieuvervuiling en dierenleed veroorzaakt.

De invloed van de bio-industrie op beleidsbepaling is enorm. Misschien in de VS nog wel groter dan in Nederland, of Europa.

Gebrek aan hygiëne bij kippenslachterijen. Kippenvlees wordt volgespoten met vuil water.

Dierenleed. Doorgefokte kippenrassen die nog nauwelijks zelfstandig kunnen staan.

Massaal gebruik van medicijnen en antibiotica als normale toevoeging aan dagelijks voer.

Voorspelling van nieuwe epidemieën van virussen door vleesconsumptie. Het boek voorspelt ver voor COVID – het boek is van 2009 – al voor een COVID-achtige pandemie. En ook dat we er nog veel meer zullen krijgen als we zo doorgaan.

Stress van varkens is een zorg voor varkensfokkers. Maar niet ingegeven door dierenleed, maar omdat het de smaak van het vlees negatief beïnvloed.

Smithfield, de grootste varkensproducent van de VS produceert een zee aan stront die gewoon op de rivieren wordt geloosd. Stront is een chemisch, supergiftige soep. Massasterfte van vissen en andere dieren is het gevolg.

Waarom blijven mensen varkens eten?

Waarom is vlees zo goedkoop? De overheid onderneemt nauwelijks actie, de consument ook niet.

Onwaarschijnlijk sadisme bij veefokkers. In alle mogelijke (on)denkbare vormen.

De bio-industrie koopt fokkers op en slachterijen die wel diervriendelijk willen werken.

Nog levende dieren worden geslacht en aan stukken gesneden. Dit is allesbehalve een uitzonderlijke situatie.

Uiteindelijk is het de consument die kiest voor het eten van vlees en het onbeschrijfelijke dierenleed en de ecologische ramp die de bio-industrie veroorzaakt.

Make Your Art No Matter What (Beth Pickens) – some book notes

Make Your Art No Matter What - Beth Pickens book cover

Quick notes from Beth Pickens’ practical guide for artists struggling to balance creative work with making a living: Make Your Art No Matter What.

What Artists Need

Artists need

  • To make art
  • To have a community of likeminded artists caring for each other
  • To consume art and information in any form

Time Management for Artists

Time is always a scarce resource. This is at least as true for artists who need to manage their time carefully. Tool: keep a time diary.

How to make time for the right things:

  • Have a sabbat: do nothing productive, including not making art, 1 day a week. Slowing down will reorganize your thinking and priorities.
  • Have a personal maintenance day once a month. During this day, create a list of goals for everything: what to try, where to be, with whom, what is important, etc.
  • Warm-up exercises: a ritual start to get your mind into a productive state
  • Ask help. If someone can help free up hours of your day.

Making a Living as an Artist

Making 100% of your income from your art will not make you happier.

Create an inventory of your skills, both technical and general. This will help you understand the jobs you are qualified for.

Do not let your employer dominate your life. Employment is a contract. That is all.

Investigate how your peeroes (peer heroes) are making money.

On Looking

In ‘On Looking’ (‘Met andere ogen’ in het Nederlands) by Alexandra Horowitz, I read, paraphrasing: if you look closely, there is always something interesting to see.

As a photographer, I was already convinced of this. You should be able to stand anywhere and take good pictures. This principle is also one of the starting points of my Noord-Holland grid project: every block can bring interesting pictures.

Some photographers suffer from the opposite: looking for the most amazing image; Cartier-Bresson’s decisive moment. BS. Recognizing a good image is then based on the images in your head. And thus, touching on Horowitz, you look over the other interesting things around you.

A third way of photographing is fantasizing about an image and making it. That is more or less how Jeff Wall works. He drives around the city, recognizes an image, remembers it, and later reconstructs it to make a photograph of it. Or Viviane Sassen, Andreas Gursky, Gregory Crewdson. The freedom of the mind is your only limitation.

Jeff Wall The Thinker 1986, staged photography lightbox

More on looking, as a writer.