Tynan: Life Nomadic

HHow to live as a global nomad. Tynan tels his story in Life Nomadic, how he sold all his stuff and started living most of the year somewhere on this globe.

His stuff fits into a 28 liter backpack. He wear silly toe-shoes, in which his feet almost freeze where he walks through the Canadian snow with them.

He lives of writing about his nomadic life.

Life Nomadic is full of tips for living a nomadic life.

Live where the locals live, eat where they eat, make friends with them, and take their advice. Before visiting a new country, I try to at the very least read the Wikipedia entry on it to get a sense of what the country is like and how it got that way.

HE does no ban all luxury from his life.

Living as a nomad should raise your quality of living, not lower it. The key concept to understand is that a high quality of living doesn’t mean spending a lot of money.

We live in an exciting time, and it’s important to me to stay part of the internet age. I carry a laptop, photojournalist-grade digital camera, and HD video camera with me at all times. My watch and phone both have GPS receivers in them to help me navigate and avoid getting lost. I’m never far from the internet.

Nomadic life is a means to a meaningful life:

When you finally get off the beaten path, you’ll find two things. First, you’ll reconnect with the sense of discovery and exploration that you had when you were a child. The act of blazing new trails and taking full responsibility for your life is exhilarating. You gain a new quiet confidence from knowing that you’re capable of driving your life, not just riding along in it. Second, you’ll find that it’s not as hard or scary as you expected.

If you’re going to spend the time to read the rest of this book, make sure that you can accept that sometimes things that sound too good to be true aren’t.

Experiences. Usually travel. No one ever regrets spending money on travel, and I think the reason why is obvious. Possessions come and go, but experiences change us as people.

But the nomadic lifestyle does not mean a life of 365 days of vacation. In fact, this one means imposing more discipline on yourself. To have a different philosophy of life.

Becoming more emotionally resilient and disciplined is almost involuntary when you become a nomad.

Our brains have been trained to believe that traveling equals being on vacation, which equals not working.

There’s this misconception that luxury is sitting on the beach doing nothing. It’s not. Luxury is having the ability and lack of encumbrances to do whatever you want to do. In that way, a minimalist nomad has the ultimate luxury. He has his time and his choice and can make of them whatever he pleases.

Tynan begins by encouraging us to jettison all unnecessary clutter and pursue a minimalism. This is a prerequisite for a nomadic life.

There’s no way to become a minimalist without just jumping in head first. And there’s just no way to become a nomad without being a minimalist.

This is not only to get rid of physical superfluous stuff, but also the psychological hang-up of stuff.

If you have stuff lingering back home then you have roots and you will never feel the true freedom of being a nomad.

How do you plan your life as a nomad? Actually, you want to plan nothing and keep complete freedom, but that can become costly.

The biggest downside of planning ahead is that you will invariably want to change your plans, but will either be unable to or will have to forfeit a ticket you’ve already purchased. The former ruins some of the versatility of traveling and the latter negates the potential cost benefits of planning ahead.

Tynan tackles this rather practically, make a list and prioritize it.

Create a list of every place you’d like to stay for a month or two. Don’t worry about how much time you’re going to be gone for, just make the list.

How do you decide which ones to remove? I tend to place an emphasis on developing countries rather than developed countries.

The comfortable and familiar can be evaluated in just a few days, and the unknown and mysterious are given enough time to be fully appreciated.

Even more important than the weather is determining which major events you want to experience in each place.

And then just do it.

Check the visa requirements for your first country, get the visa, and buy a one way ticket.

Travel light, live light.

Twenty Eight Liters is All You Need

If you bring something that is not making your trip better, it’s making your trip worse.

No travel bag other than a backpack. And in it the most necessary, and nothing more.

The reasons for choosing a backpack are as numerous as they are obvious. Any terrain can be crossed, they compact when they’re less full, they don’t stick out, and they are designed to be waterproofed.

Sticking with our minimalist nomad philosophy, here’s the clothing packing list: • Two pairs of socks • Two pairs of underwear • One pair of convertible pants • One bathing suit • Three shirts • One bra (if you’re a woman, or a crossdresser)

All clothing made of wool.

Wool does an amazing job wicking sweat away, dries quickly, keeps us warm even when wet, and smells great.

Also of underwear you need only two, if you have good ones, of wool, and of shirts 3.

Underwear falls in basically the same category. Get two pair and wash them every day in the shower.

… pack three shirts, which occasionally feels like one too many. Wool is, of course, the fabric of choice,

Other stuff: The stuff you need to document your travels.

For this reason, I say to take what you need to document your travels and share them with your friends, family, and maybe even the whole world.

Camera … A micro four-thirds: compact and quality. Laptop. Cell Phone. Charging your gadgets: All USB.

For all its travel gear, tenant creates a new web page every year: tynan.net/gearyyy. For example: http://tynan.com/gear2018.

Find a credit card company that doesn’t charge a conversion fee. There are.

Recommend about sending and receiving physical mail. Is a bit outdated.

Also, calling abroad is outdated.  These days Skype is the Go-To facility for this and you can make calls all over the world for a few cents a minute.

Language learning: Pimsleur.

Immersion is the only real way to learn a language. Pimsleur immerses you in your new language for half an hour a day, but it will take more than that to gain real fluency.

Reasonably detailed picture of his expenses, as an example to show that life does not have to be expensive.

I spend somewhere around $1500 per month, which is broken down approximately as follows: • $500 for lodging[1]  • $265 for plane, train, ship, and cruise tickets • $500 for food  • $50 in fees for phones, remote mail, faxing • $185 in gear replacement and miscellaneous expenses

Traveling as cheaply as possible yet comfortably. Practical recommendation of which days to travel, one-way instead of round-trip (or return as this is cheaper in some cases), fly via major hubs, use AirAsia and Southwest as examples of cheap airlines.

Use your credit card to get lounge access. Lounge is resting, but also free food and sometimes showering.

Lots of references to useful web sites. This one for trains was really all new to me:

I could go on and on about trains, but the truth is that I get all of my information from one place, Seat61.com.

Where do you want to stay: location is most important.

My typical modus operandi is to land in a country with no plans at all, find a hostel, and stay there for a couple days as I make friends and get the lay of the land. It usually doesn’t take long to familiarize myself with the different areas of town, which helps me make a good decision on where I want to live.

And then of course make money to pay for everything.

I will, however, condense some of the best advice I’ve read and absorbed over the years:

  • Do work that you’re passionate about. Let the money come second.
  • Create something remarkable that provides real benefit to your customers.
  • Work harder than anyone else and hold yourself to higher standards than everyone else.
  • Be ruthlessly persistent. Most people aren’t.

Where to go: it actually comes down to preparing yourself a bit and widening the tourist traps.

We discovered Yakushima through the free online catalog of UNESCO World Heritiage sites…. What I particularly like about the World Heritage Sites is that there’s usually a lot of substance and few fellow travelers.


Wikipedia and Wikitravel. Neither is as comprehensive as a guidebook, but they’re generally written by people who really care about the area they’re writing about. Amongst the standard hotel recommendations and

The crux.

Travel with an open mind. Accept invitations and extend them as well. Indulge in other cultures and appreciate the best in them.

Will Robots Take your Job – and what about us?

I read: Nigel M. de S. Cameron‘s – Will Robots Take Your Job.

Beyond what the title might suggest, Cameron passionately argues that politicians are negligent in their blind spot for a looming technological tsunami. Imagine a world where entire industries crumble, where millions of workers wake up to find their careers erased by algorithms and machines. This isn’t science fiction—it’s a potential reality racing towards us at breakneck speed.

The political myopia is frustratingly familiar. Much like environmental concerns, short-sighted politicians push this existential threat aside in their microscopic four-year election cycles. They’re playing a dangerous game of technological roulette with people’s livelihoods.

The narrative glaringly lacks the most critical question: What will humans actually do if robots consume our jobs? How will we restructure society when traditional work becomes obsolete? The economic implications are staggering—we’re talking about a fundamental reimagining of income, purpose, and human value in an age of unprecedented automation.

This isn’t just about job loss. It’s about the complete reconstruction of how we define meaningful contribution, social worth, and personal identity in a world where human labor might become an antiquated concept.

The text demands we pay attention—not with fear but with strategic foresight. Our future depends on asking the right questions today.

Kinfolk – advice from Creative Entrepreneurs

I was gifted Entrepreneurs in creative jobs interviewed by a good friend. My notes from the not very concrete advice from the interviewees, but inspiring book and good images.

– Develop your own vision.

– Fresh ideas regularly.

– Be fearless.

– Adapt.

– Strive for authenticity.

– Focus on core values.

– Persistence.

– Don’t be lazy.

– Do not give up.

– Treat people well.

– Confront what you have to face.

– Visions inspire us but also limit us.

– Write a letter to your future self.

– Nothing happens unless you focus all your energy on it.

– Stay curious.

– Do not get comfortable.

– Stay slippery, or you stop learning and growing.

– Move on to something else.

– Be resilient

– Enjoy things as they come

– Stay flexible and open

– Do not hesitate to ask for help. Especially in times of need.

– As an entrepreneur, have a hobby that makes you stop.

Innovation: getting comfortable with chaos

First impression: this book is either beyond my intelligence.

People in Rainforests are motivated for reasons that defy traditional economic notions of “rational” behavior.

Had to re-read that sentence a couple of times to grasp its meaning. I hit a few more of these texts in The Rainforest, by Victor W. Hwang and Greg Horowitt.

I was a false start. Now and then the writers fall in the trap of academic writing, and they follow the “misguided lessons you learn in academia” as Jason Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson call it in “Rework” (more on that in another post).

The book looks at psychological, neurological context of forming innovation groups, and what to look at. It touches open many other aspects of inactive environments (rainforests).

There’s a sociological aspect to it that very much speaks to my heart.

As veteran Silicon Valley venture capitalist Kevin Fong says, “At a certain point, it’s not about the money anymore. Every engineer wants their product to make a difference.”

This reminds me of The Soul of a New Machine from Tracy Kidder. Excellent book by the way, a must read for (computer) engineers and other Betas. You will get your soldering iron out.
Anyway in this book also, the goal of money is way out of sight, it is the product that counts. Personal issues are set aside, esthetic issues with respect to the new machine prevail. The team is totally dedicated to creating the new machine. They are in the flow, very similar to the psychological flow that psychology professor Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, has described in “Flow”. The state in which people (typically athletes talk a lot about pushing themselves into a flow) where conscious thinking and acting disappear and a person gets totally submerged in the activity itself.

Back to the Rainforest, where the authors have found that a social context is key for a innovative rainforest to thrive. It’s not just about creating the brain power, but an entire entrepreneurial context that turns this brainpower into a innovative growing organism. The trick is to create a social environment where cross-fertilization takes place.

“Governments are increasingly seeking to spur entrepreneurial activity across the entire system, not just for large companies. Today, countries are ambitiously seeking to create entire innovation economies.”

 

 

“The biggest invisible bottleneck in innovation is not necessarily the economic desirability of a project, the quality of the technology, or the rational willingness of the customer. The real cost frequently boils down to the social distance between two vastly different parties.”

“Serendipitous networking is essential because, in the real world, it is impossible for a central agent to do everything.”

A lot of word and advice are spent on the topic. Tools are presented as guidelines for achieving such an environment.

“Tool #1: Learn by Doing Tool #2: Enhance Diversity Tool #3: Celebrate Role Models and Peer Interaction Tool #4: Build Tribes of Trust Tool #5: Create Social Feedback Loops Tool #6: Make Social Contracts Explicit”

I am not sure if Hwang and Horowitt prove in their work that a central organization (government) can really steer this. An analytical approach to culture change is something different from a (working) prescriptive culture change. I may be skeptical, but with me are the Fried and Heinemeier again in Rework about culture (in context of an organisation):

“Culture is the byproduct of consistent behaviour. 

It isn’t a policy. It isn’t the Christmans party or the company picnic. Those are objects and events, not culture. And it’s not a slogan, either. Culture is action, not words.”

The Rainforest continues and brings together Deming’s approach to maximize quality of product procedures by an organization with the entrepreneurial approach towards innovation. This so serve as a model to evolve innovative, informal and entrepreneurial spirited organizations, a kind of primordial soup into mature structured organization.
(In this soup of entrepreneurial elements, a “flow” should be created igniting an entrepreneurial life form.)

“We surmise that one of the major reasons large corporations often fail at innovation―whether they create venture arms, new product divisions, or otherwise―is because they typically create new business divisions in a formal sense without the “cultural walls” separating the Deming and the Rainforest communities.”

Interestingly this is also what Christensen speaks of in “The Innovators Dilemma”. Christensen makes a similar claim. Organizations fail at innovation because they manage innovation the same way as they do there mature business units. This inherently fails. There is a lot of similarity between the thinking of Christensen and Hwang here. These guys should talk. And invite Fried and Heinemeier to the party.

I conclude managing innovation in an existing (large) organizations can only be successful if it is operated in a completely separate entity. With their own culture that is free to grow, and in a social environment that is not constraint by bureaucratic “efficiencies”.

Good to Great – Jim Collins

I was astonished, reading Good To Great. It has so many findings about great companies, that are so massively ignored.

Many business leaders have referred to this book. While in their own organizations the findings they cast aside the findings in this book on a day by day basis.

I will go through a couple of them.

Ten of eleven good-to-great CEOs came from inside the company, whereas the comparison companies tried outside CEOs six times more often.

So no need to attract expensive business leaders from the outside. What we hear about their compensations schemes we sometimes find unethical and excessive.

We found no systematic pattern linking specific forms of executive compensation to the process of going from good to great.

Not only does the compensation not necessarily need to be very high. Moreover, the leaders of these companies stand out in humility. Leaders of great companies are to themselves, focused on the company, not themselves, have a big sense of humility and do not have big egos, are persistent calm and determined.

Self-effacing, quiet, reserved, even shy—these leaders are a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will.

As surprising, great companies are not great because they have such a fantastic strategy. Nor is it technology or acquisitions, a very promising industry or special program.

Greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness, it turns out, is largely a matter of conscious choice.
All companies have a culture, some companies have discipline, but few companies have a culture of discipline.

When you have disciplined people, you don’t need hierarchy. When you have disciplined thought, you don’t need bureaucracy. When you have disciplined action, you don’t need excessive controls. When you combine a culture of discipline with an ethic of entrepreneurship, you get the magical alchemy of great performance.

They never use technology as the primary means of igniting a transformation. Yet, paradoxically, they are pioneers in the application of carefully selected technologies.

Discipline and perseverance are the most important traits of great companies.

Every good-to-great company embraced what we came to call the Stockdale Paradox: You must maintain unwavering faith that you can and will prevail in the end, regardless of the difficulties, AND at the same time have the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.

In confronting the brutal facts, the good-to-great companies left themselves stronger and more resilient, not weaker and more dispirited. There is a sense of exhilaration that comes in facing head-on the hard truths and saying, “We will never give up. We will never capitulate. It might take a long time, but we will find a way to prevail…”

No, those who turn good into great are motivated by a deep creative urge and an inner compulsion for sheer unadulterated excellence for its own sake.

It is doing the work, a feel for business, perseverance, a lack of arrogance, not taking anything for granted, that distinguishes the great companies.

It is in such a sharp contrast with what you see in the large majority of the Fortune 500 companies, that I wonder how the leaders in these companies, and the big consulting companies advising these companies, and likely the investors in these companies can continue to ignore such fundamental findings.

When you put these two complementary forces together—a culture of discipline with an ethic of entrepreneurship—you get a magical alchemy of superior performance and sustained results.

And if you cannot be the best in the world at your core business, then your core business cannot form the basis of your Hedgehog Concept.

When used right, technology becomes an accelerator of momentum, not a creator of it. The good-to-great companies never began their transitions with pioneering technology, for the simple reason that you cannot make good use of technology until you know which technologies are relevant.

 

Mason Curry – Daily Rituals

Interesting book about artists’ routines in creating work.

Conclusion: discipline is everything. And dedication. And perseverance. See also Ryan Holiday’s The Obstacle is the Way.

Francis Bacon: chaos and total dedication.

Simone de Beauvoir: total asceticism.

Kierkegaard: coffee and sugar, walking, writing.

Benjamin Franklin: air bath (meditation?).

Anthony Trollope: writing 3 hours a day for work. Copied his mother here, who wrote for 4 hours before making breakfast.

Toulouse Lautrec: booze.

Thomas Mann: family man with a strict schedule for writing.

Mahler: schedule. Moody and lonely boy.

Matisse , Margaret Mead: always working.

Gertrude Stein: what a spoiled baby she is.

Ann Beatty: can only write if she’s really inspired.

Murakami: schedule, no social life.

William James: automate everything, leave yourself free for better activities.

James Joyce: estimates that it took him 20000 hours to write Ulysses.

Beckett made his depression work for him.

Sartre: regime and pills, cigarettes, alcohol.

Graham Greene: wrote 2 books at once. On pills.

Umberto Eco: can write anywhere, anytime.

David Lynch: sugar.

Paul Erdos: machine that turns coffee into scaffolding.

Abramovic: rigorous.

Twyla Tharpe: asocial = procreative.

Bernard Malamud: conclusion: in the end, everyone learns his or her own best way. The real mystery to crack is you.

Denis Johnson – Angels

Denis johnson - angels

Angels. Not really. The story of 2 alcoholic drifters working their way through life. Making a habit of taking the wrong, or rather, no, decisions. Dark, like Jesus Son. Bukowski-esk, but I find this one darker and more pessimistic. People are tested, while in Bukowski, they make their own choices. And there is a bit more humor and relativizing in Bukowski.

And people do not get raped in Bukowski like in here.

A Houston family. A low social standing. All three brothers from 2 fathers follow the wrong path. Sex, drugs, alcohol, violence, crime. And all incapable of finding a way out.

The book has a marvelous ending.

Beautiful.

Ed van der Elsken, street photographer in love

I visited Ed van der Elsken’s retrospective at the Stedelijk Museum. Van der Elsken is chaotic and distinctly extroverted, an expressionist. His films are messy and experimental. The exhibition was impressive, but mostly, it was a lot.

I came down the stairs with a full head. The book De Verliefde Camera is the catalog of this retrospective. In the introduction, Hripsimé Visser, the catalog’s compiler, calls the work vibrant and dynamic. Surely that seems like an understatement. The book gives an overview of Van der Elsken’s work chronologically.

Paris, street photographs. Then, a series called A Love Story: Love on the Left Bank. The photographs in this series are large areas of black, little light, and stark—more lust than love.

Then Africa. Again, rather dark photos. Where the story is anthropological, in my opinion, Van der Elsken was much more interested in the aesthetics of black people. Close-ups of Negroes and Negresses, and I don’t mean that as a swear word, but as an indication of the style of the photographs. Photographs that are not about life in Africa as their subject but much more about the anatomy of the African man.

Sweet Life. Van der Elsken at his best: street photographs of everything that comes in front of the camera that he finds interesting. Here, Van der Elsken measures up to William Klein and Robert Frank.

Amsterdam. There are street photos, reportage-style photos, and portraits. Again, the individual photos are the strongest. The street photos are of everyday things.

Eye Love You. Color for the first time. Everyday scenes. Topper: a photo of elderly ladies with sunglasses and in neat dresses photographing two Negro children as if they were at the zoo. The vicarious blush comes to your cheeks.

Japan. Again, the street photos of someone who takes unfettered pictures of everyday subjects.

Ultimately, Ed van der Elsken was primarily an excellent street photographer who tried to make ends meet through his photography. His street photographs are world-class.

Een Klein Leven, een dik boek, laat maar

Mishandelde jongen wordt als volwassene onverbeterlijke zelfmutilant die zijn hele leven anderen tot last is niets positiefs bijdraagt en na uitgesponnen verhaal uiteindelijke zelfmoord pleegt.

Blijft irritant.

Vreselijk overschat boek van Hanya Yanagihara. Een Klein Leven.

Niet lezen.